Jump To Navigation

Riverhead DUI/DWI Defense Law Blog

Suffolk County sobriety checkpoint leads to arrests

Suffolk County readers of this blog have been exposed to discussions about the probable cause requirement for stopping a driver on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. Erratic driving or a traffic accident most likely will satisfy that inquiry. Yet readers may be unsure of how that Fourth Amendment procedural protection plays out in the context of a sobriety checkpoint, where authorities stop every vehicle.

In New York, courts have determined that checkpoints as constitutionally permissible. In fact, that conclusion is the majority viewpoint, shared by 37 other American States, as well as the District of Columbia. Although courts recognize that drivers have an interest in being free from unreasonable searches and seizures, it may be outweighed by the threat of drunk drivers, at least to the extent of allowing checkpoints.

Cop may have falsified drunk driving charge

New Yorkers may disown any attempts to draw parallels between their state and neighboring New Jersey. However, a recent story involving a lawmaker from the Garden State can serve as a sobering reminder of the aggressive enforcement attitudes which drivers pulled over on suspicion of driving while intoxicated may face.

It may be tempting for a driver who is confident that his or her blood alcohol level is within legal limits to argue with an officer during a DWI stop. However, determinations of probable cause and evidence beyond a reasonable doubt may be best left to a lawyer at a later stage.

Ruling likely won't affect DWI enforcement methods

In a recent post, Suffolk County readers observed the example set by Reese Witherspoon -- at least in terms of what not to do when pulled over on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. Although Ms. Witherspoon was only a passenger in the car, her verbal challenges to the officer’s authority to pull them over earned her an arrest for disorderly conduct.

That lesson might be useful to remember for drivers who rely too much on a recently ruling by the United States Supreme Court on the lawfulness of DWI blood testing without a warrant. The Court affirmed the principle that a warrant is required to conduct a search and seizure. Although there may be an exception to that warrant requirement in the case of evidence facing imminent destruction, the Court further determined that such exceptional circumstances ordinarily do not apply to a suspect’s blood alcohol levels. As a result, enforcement officials will still be required to obtain a warrant before obtaining a blood sample from a DWI suspect.

Drunk school bus driver crashes into Long Island home

A recent Long Island drunk driving accident has prompted New York lawmakers to consider revising state laws against driving while intoxicated, at least in the context of bus drivers.

According to authorities, a 66-year-old school bus driver was scheduled to take the five students under the age of ten to their homes. The driver picked up the children on time, at the end of their school day at St. Edward the Confessor school. However, the driver didn't make it very far. He crashed into a garage attached to a home located practically across the street from the school where the children had boarded the mini-bus.

Drunk driving incident precedes New York film premiere

New York fans of Reese Witherspoon might have to recalibrate their image of the "Legally Blond" star. The actress was recently jailed on a late Friday night for allegedly disorderly conduct displayed during her husband's concurrent drunk driving arrest. It turned out to be a whirlwind weekend for the film star. Shortly after her release from jail, the star attended the Tribeca Film Festival in New York, where her new film "Mud" premiered.

According to the arrest record, a state trooper observed erratic driving and swerving from a motor vehicle driven by the star's husband, Jim Toth. The state trooper pulled the car over and interviewed its driver. That led to a field sobriety test and a Breathalyzer test. Mr. Toth reportedly did not pass the tests. In fact, the breath test returned a blood alcohol level of 0.139.

Hit-and-run Suffolk County drunk driver faces multiple charges

Charges of driving while intoxicated carry potentially severe consequences in Suffolk County. License suspension, jail time and fines are some of the penalties that may attach to a DWI conviction, even for first-time offenders. When a drunk driving incident results in a fatality, however, the DWI offender may be facing multiple criminal charges. In some cases, multiple alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents may arise from a singular poor decision to drink and drive.

One Suffolk man is in precisely this predicament. He is facing multiple felony charges, including aggravated vehicular homicide, aggravated vehicular assault, and manslaughter -- all in addition to his DWI charge.

Long Island drunk driver dodges oncoming cars

Long Island movie fans may have seen car chase scenes where a speeding car enters a highway on the wrong side of traffic, resulting in a high-speed obstacle course of dodging oncoming cars. In fact, New York City has been the set for several such movie scenes.

In real life, however, driving into oncoming traffic almost always begins with a drunk driver and ends in tragedy. Today's story is no different.

Hit-and-run drunk driver apprehended in Suffolk County

Suffolk County drivers facing charges of driving while intoxicated may have an uphill defense ahead of them, especially when a traffic violation is involved. New York police typically need probable cause to pull a driver over on suspicion of drunk driving. Yet a driver observed to be driving on the wrong side of the road may not have a ready explanation. In such an instance, any comment on the behavior might be better left to an attorney.

A Suffolk County man from Lindenhurst is currently facing this dilemma. He was driving in the wrong lanes of Southern State Parkway, near Route 110 in Farmingdale, when he crashed into an oncoming vehicle. Unfortunately, the 25-year-old driver made the decision to flee the scene.

Drunk driving arrest on the Long Island Expressway

A Suffolk County man was recently arrested in the early hours of a Sunday morning for driving while intoxicated off the Long Island Expressway in Lake Ronkonkoma. Unfortunately, police responded to the scene only after the driver had already hit a pedestrian. Police report that they found the pedestrian in the roadway and pronounced him dead at the scene. Additional details about the DWI arrest have not yet been released.

Suffolk County drivers who partake in local nightlife may sometimes feel like the police set up enforcement patrols specially targeting the Saturday night bar crowd. Under New York law, however, an officer typically cannot randomly stop a car. Rather, the officer usually must observe a traffic offense or some indicia of impaired driving before pulling over a driver.

Long Island man charged with drunk driving

Authorities recently arrested a 51-year-old West Hempstead man for drunk driving. They initially pulled the man over for reckless driving, but their interview revealed that the man was driving while intoxicated. It's unclear whether the police required the man to take a field sobriety test or a breath-screening test for the presence of alcohol before arresting him. As New York readers likely know, however, the man probably consented to such testing because refusing a chemical test typically results in an automatic one-year driver's license suspension.

Under New York law, a first DWI offense -- driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher -- is typically a misdemeanor, although the accompanying fines and potential jail time are enhanced if the BAC was 0.18 or higher. In addition, a first time DWI conviction may also result in license revocation.

Do You Have A Case?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close